The Right to Keep and Bear Arms by Quilici vs. Morton Grove Essay

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms by Quilici vs. Morton Grove - Essay typesetters caseS. Constitution and wanted the ordinance declared unconstitutional.Morton Groves main argument is based on evidence1 which showed that prohibiting the ownership of handguns within the Village will help make the partnership safer by reducing the number of deaths and accidents caused by handguns. In addition, Morton Grove claimed it had the right to resort to police power to guarantee peace and safety in the community, and that by passing Ordinance 81-11, the village is not violating any of the rights guaranteed by the Illinois Constitution2The court took the side of Morton Grove and dismissed the case, arguing that it had the right to regulate the ownership and possession of guns and that the Ordinance did not violate the second amendment and the Illinois constitution (Quilici v. Morton Grove II para. 4 and III para. 5).The right to possess firearms is an emotional issue that continues to be argued i n courts all over the country. The reason is that this issue reaches into concerns that are very human the defense, protection, and preservation of life, and our search for security.People who push for the right to own guns may support valid reasons to believe that way. Perhaps, their lives have been threatened in the past.